A new endoscopic technique for suspension of esophageal prosthesis for refractory caustic esophageal strictures.

There is no clear consensus concerning the best endoscopic treatment of benign refractory esophageal strictures due to caustic ingestion. Different procedures are currently used: frequent multiple dilations, retrievable self-expanding stent, nasogastric intubation and surgery. We describe a new technique to fix a suspended esophageal silicone prosthesis to the neck in benign esophageal strictures; this permits us to avoid the frequent risk of migration of the expandable metallic or plastic stents. Under general anesthesia a rigid esophagoscope was placed in the patient's hypopharynx. Using transillumination from the optical device, the patient's neck was pierced with a needle. A n.0 monofilament surgical wire was pushed into the needle, grasped by a standard foreign body forceps through the esophagoscope and pulled out of the mouth (as in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy procedure). After tying the proximal end of the silicone prosthesis with the wire, it was placed through the strictures under endoscopic view. This procedure was successfully utilized in four patients suffering from benign refractory esophageal strictures due to caustic ingestion. The prosthesis and its suspension from the neck were well-tolerated until removal (mean duration 4 months). A postoperative transitory myositis was diagnosed in only one patient. One of the most frequent complications of esophageal prostheses in refractory esophageal strictures due to caustic ingestion is distal migration. Different solutions were proposed. For example the suspension of a wire coming from the nose and then fixed behind the ear. This solution is not considered optimal because of patient complaints and moreover the aesthetic aspect is compromised. The procedure we utilized in four patients utilized the setting of a silicone tube hanging from the neck in a way similar to that of endoscopic pharyngostomy. This solution is a valid alternative both for quality of life and for functional results.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in portal hypertension.

UNLABELLED: Although the first studies on EUS in portal hypertension are by now dated approximately 20 years ago, this method still has not become a routine examination among the diagnostic and therapeutic examinations in this field. EUS has an important role in the following applications: early diagnosis of esophageal and gastric varices and of hypertensive gastropathy, screening of subjects to treat medically, endoscopically or surgically, and their follow-up, EUS-guided injection therapy of varices. Several papers have confirmed and/or added important clinical applications to the EUS use in such patients. In fact, if at the beginnig the studies were concentrated on the best way to show varices compared to the endoscopic examination, or on aspects still unknown such as the presence of periesophageal veins and collaterals increased in number and diameter, at present sophisticated instruments with several types of Doppler and therapeutic possibilities are available. The observation of perforating veins under the esophagogastric junction seems to have a particular clinical interest having a predictive value on the effectiveness of the sclerotherapy and therefore on the final eradication. Also the several instrumentations used can modify the RESULTS: Using the high frequencies EUS miniprobes, the sensibility in identifying even the minimal or initial varices increases. In the evaluation of the pharmacological therapy, EUS with the new instruments equipped with color Doppler can be very useful and can replace other diagnostic methods very invasive and dangerous and thus used only in highly specialized centers. As to the nursing aspect of EUS in portal hypertension, it must be underlined that such pathology is often the consequence of viral hepatitis infection. Therefore, beside a correct clinical evaluationl before endoscopic ultrasound examination, all devices, drugs and anything else could be be necessary to complete with success an intervention, e.g. sclerotherapy in emergency, should be prepared in advance.

Multimodal imaging of esophagus and cardia cancer before and after treatment.

PURPOSE: Prognosis and treatment of esophagus and cardia cancer (ECC) depend on the precision with which the disease is staged according to the American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC) criteria. Imaging modalities normally used in clinical staging are esophagography, esophagoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography- CT fusion (CT-PET). The combination of these methods is crucial in determining not only the right diagnosis but also the stage and follow-up after multimodal treatment. The purpose of our investigation was to define the role of each imaging modality in determining the most appropriate treatment options in patients with ECC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients with ECC diagnosed by X-ray of the upper digestive tract, endoscopy and biopsy were staged using EUS, chest and abdomen CT scan, and CT-PET. Thirty-four patients in stage II and 18 patients in stage III underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; four patients in stage IV were treated with the positioning of an endoprosthesis after chemoradiotherapy. In the 52 patients who had surgery, follow-up included digestive tract X-ray, endoscopy and CT of the chest and abdomen every 6-8 months for the first 3 years. CT-PET was only performed in patients with a clinical suspicion of recurrence and/or CT findings suspicious of persistent disease (12 cases). RESULTS: In all 56 patients, endoscopy, EUS, CT and CT-PET in combination were crucial in determining the site of disease, locoregional extent and depth of esophageal wall penetration (T), and any involvement of the mediastinal lymph nodes (N1), extrathoracic lymph nodes (M1) or hepatic metastases. In the locoregional staging of ECC before chemotherapy, we were able to differentiate T2-T3 from T4 in 40 patients; T4 disease was found in 12 potentially resectable cases. We were able to distinguish N0 from N1 in 12 patients. In four cases, the presence of small lymph node and/or liver metastases prompted positioning of an endoprosthesis. The specificity of CT in detecting small lymph nodes in the mediastinum was less than 50% while for CT-PET, it was more than 80%; EUS revealed sensitivity higher than 90% but a low specificity in seven cases. Only CT-PET revealed metastatic subdiaphragmatic lymph nodes (diameter <15 mm) in three cases. Presurgical restaging of the 18 patients (stage III) who had chemotherapy was based on endoscopy, EUS, CT of the chest and abdomen and CT-PET (only in suspected cases) and was compatible with surgery. Anastomotic recurrence was diagnosed in 16 patients by endoscopy with associated biopsy; any intramediastinal spread from anastomotic recurrences was evaluated by chest CT, and CT-PET in suspected cases. CONCLUSIONS: X-ray of the upper digestive tract and chest and abdomen CT scan are useful in preliminary evaluation of ECC. Endoscopy is particularly indicated for evaluating tumour morphology, taking biopsies for a histological diagnosis and the early diagnosis of anastomotic recurrences. EUS is indicated mainly for evaluating T stage before and after chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. CT-PET is extremely useful in identifying small mediastinal metastatic lymph nodes (N1) or extrathoracic lymph nodes (M1) and hepatic metastases (

Endoscopic treatment of pseudosarcomatous squamous carcinoma of the esophagus: case report and personal experience.

Spindle cell (or pseudosarcomatous) squamous carcinoma (PSC) is a rare malignant neoplasm of the esophagus, potentially capable of causing lymph node and distant metastases. Indications for surgery are the same as for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus. The aims of this paper were to report a case of endoscopically treated PSC and to review our experience of surgically-treated patients with PSC in order to identify patients potentially suitable for endoscopic treatment. In our series of 4,460 patients with carcinoma of the esophagus observed between 1980 and 2003, 28 (0.6%) had the histological features of PSC. One had a PSC histologically confirmed (8cm-long polyp with a 3cm-large base) and endoscopically treated for high surgical risk. The patient had a close follow-up with endoscopic biopsies and ultrasonography with no local recurrence at 3 years. The overall survival rate was 22% for PSC and 17% for SCC (P = n.s.); after 5 years, the survival rates were 22% and 13%, respectively (P = n.s.). In our opinion the limited tendency to parietal infiltration and the good chance of disclosure in an early stage with endoscopic ultrasonography, justify non-surgical solutions in patients with a high surgical risk, possibly associated with adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy since lymph node involvement is reported in 50% of cases. The limited number of patients with PSC involved in the present series prevent any significant statistical comparisons between the different groups, but the survival rates were roughly the same in the nonsurgical curative therapy as in the curative resection group, while the chances of survival were significantly lower in patients given palliative surgery and or non-curative treatments (P < 0.05).

Single-band mucosectomy for granular cell tumor of the esophagus: safe and easy technique.

BACKGROUND: Mucosectomy involves resection of a digestive wall fragment that frequently removes a part or even all of the submucosal mass. The single-band mucosectomy technique was used to remove a granular cell tumor (GCT) of the esophagus. Only 3% of GCTs, which are relatively uncommon neoplasms, arise in the esophagus. Ultrasonography has allowed for more frequent recognition and better definition of this disease. Until recently, surgical resection of the esophagus has been the only treatment alternative to endoscopic surveillance. Endoscopic techniques such as mucosal resection (EMR), laser, and argon plasma have been proposed as safe and effective alternatives to surgery. However, to date, only a few reports of these endoscopic techniques have been published. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-band mucosectomy for removing a GCT of the esophagus. METHODS: Six patients (1 man and 5 women; mean age, 45 years) with a GCT were studied between January 2000 and May 2004. They underwent EMR after endoscopic ultrasonography. RESULTS: The EMR was performed with a diathermic loop after injection of saline solution into the esophageal wall. Only one session was necessary for removal of the tumor from all 6 patients, and no complication was observed. During a mean clinical endoscopic follow-up period of 36 months, no recurrences, scars, or stenoses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show EMR to be a safe and effective technique that allows complete removal of GCTs. Furthermore, this technique provides tissue for a definitive pathologic diagnosis, which laser and argon plasma do not provide. We recommend EMR as the treatment of choice for GCTs after an accurate ultrasonographic evaluation.

Endosonography in gastric lymphoma and large gastric folds.

To establish a correct preoperative differential diagnosis between gastric lymphoma and cancer is essential but can be difficult as endoscopic biopsies can sometimes provide a low diagnostic yield. By EUS, infiltrative carcinoma tends to show a vertical growth in the gastric wall, while lymphoma tends to show mainly a horizontal extension. EUS provides an accurate staging of gastric lymphoma, showing the exact level of infiltration and the presence of perigastric lymph nodes, thus the physician can obtain an accurate prognosis for each patient and select the best form of treatment accordingly. The response to chemoradiotherapy can also be investigated very accurately by EUS. Large gastric folds are seen in a great number of benign and malignant conditions. Diagnosis represents a clinical challenge because etiology may be extremely varied and standard biopsies are often inconclusive. Different diseases show different levels of infiltration of the gastric wall, thus a characteristic echo-pattern helps for the differential diagnosis. Endosonography, used always in combination with biopsy, allows to rule out malignancies and to select the most appropriate treatment for each patient (medical or surgical).

Endoscopic ultrasonography in large gastric folds.

Large gastric folds are seen in a great number of benign and malignant conditions. Diagnosis is a clinical challenge because the etiology may be extremely varied and standard biopsies are often inconclusive. The gastric wall is considered thickened at endosonography when it is more than 3.6 mm in width. Different diseases show different levels of infiltration of the gastric wall. When abnormalities involve the second layer only, benign conditions can be considered and standard endoscopic biopsies are often diagnostic. When abnormalities involve layers two and three, different diseases can be suspected, including Helicobacter pylori infection and lymphoma; in this case large-particle biopsy should be considered. When abnormalities involve layer four, malignancy should be strongly suspected even if standard or large-particle biopsies are negative. Endosonography, always in combination with fine-needle or guillotine-needle biopsy, should be able to rule out malignancies and to select the most appropriate treatment for each patient.

Cancer of the esophagus--endoscopic ultrasound: selection for cure.

Several treatment options are available to treat esophageal cancer. Ideally, treatment should be individualized, based on the projected treatment outcome for that individual. Accurate staging of the extent of the disease at the time of diagnosis offers the most rational attempt at stratifying patients into categories that can be used to affect treatment choices. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most accurate nonoperative technique for determining the depth of tumour infiltration and thus is accurate in predicting which patients will be able to undergo complete resection. EUS is also being used for tumour staging in order to guide treatment decisions in patients with esophageal cancer.

Endoscopic ultrasonography.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is nowadays a clinically relevant technology and its findings can have a major impact on patient management. This technique is currently indicated for staging digestive cancers, assessment of submucosal tumors, diagnosis of intestinal wall infiltrative diseases, common bile-duct stones and gut neuroendocrine tumors. As far as neoplasms are concerned, EUS appears to be a reliable and safe technique, thus making the physician able to plan either an aggressive surgical treatment, or a conservative palliative therapy. This is of the utmost importance in order to optimize medical-related costs, and to make the best therapeutic decision for each individual patient. EUS is also helpful in monitoring the course of a disease, as it is simple and virtually without complications. When EUS findings are not sufficient for a complete diagnosis, it is now possible to perform an EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy, which can allow a cytological diagnosis. Finally, some therapeutic endosonography-guided procedures are being increasingly adopted, such as cystoenterostomy, celiac plexus neurolysis, cholangio-pancreatography and selective injection of botulinum toxin in the muscle layer of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Weekend therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of a short-term regimen (weekend therapy) in the cure of Helicobacter pylori infection and to analyze the factors that may influence the success of the treatment. METHODS: Seventy-one patients with gastric colonization by a tinidazole sensitive H. pylori strain (34 duodenal ulcer and 37 nonulcer dyspepsia) received omeprazole 40 mg o.m. for 7 days (from Monday to Sunday) and bismuth 240 mg q.i.d. + amoxicillin 1000 mg/q.i.d. + tinidazole 500 mg q.i.d. for only 2 days (Saturday and Sunday). Endoscopy, histology, culture, urease test, and susceptibility studies were done at entry and 30 days after treatment. RESULTS: Successful eradication was obtained in 84% of patients. The percentage of eradication was higher in duodenal ulcer patients (94%) than in those with nonulcer dyspepsia (74%; p < 0.05), and in patients who received the treatment during hot weather (94%) than in those who received the treatment during cold weather (74%; p < 0.05). Side-effects were induced by the treatment in 17% of patients, and these were all not severe, self-limiting, short-lasting, and did not require specific treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggested that weekend therapy with high doses of drugs represents an effective, safe, and inexpensive therapeutic approach for the treatment of H. pylori infection, particularly in patients with duodenal ulcer. Furthermore, they also confirm the relevant role that short-term treatments may play in the therapeutic approach to H. pylori infection, and highlight some important aspects influencing short-term schedules.

Value of serology (ELISA) for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: evaluation in patients attending endoscopy and in those with fundic atrophic gastritis.

In the present study we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of four commercial IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Autoplate, H.pylori-EIA-Well, Enzygnost, Helori-test) and evaluated the performance of these tests in patients with fundic atrophic gastritis. Serum antibodies to Helicobacter pylori were measured in 70 out-patients attending endoscopy for dyspepsia and 43 patients with non-autoimmune fundic atrophic gastritis. Using the cut-off values recommended by the manufacturers, and comparing serological findings with gastric biopsy results of dyspeptic out-patients attending endoscopy, the four kits showed a sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of 91% and 96%, for Autoplate, 67% and 100% for H.pylori-EIA-Well, 79% and 100% for Enzygnost, and 81% and 96% for Helori-test. Evaluation in patients with atrophic gastritis revealed a high prevalence of antibodies to Helicobacter pylori (84%) and it demonstrated that patients with and those without gastric colonization by this microorganism had a similar rate of seropositivity (76-84% vs 50-78%). In conclusion, our data demonstrate that: a) this assay is a reliable and valid method to detect gastric colonization by Helicobacter pylori; b) positive serum antibody associated with a negative detection of Helicobacter pylori in the gastric mucosa suggests mucosal atrophy; c) patients with fundic atrophic gastritis should be excluded from studies investigating the value of serology in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection.

Endoscopic ultrasonography in gastric lymphoma.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was performed in 82 patients with primary gastric lymphoma. EUS correctly diagnosed lymphoma in 76/82 patients, with a sensitivity of 93%. Positive predictability was 91%, specificity 98%, and negative predictability 98%. Diagnostic accuracy was 97%. In the evaluation of lymphoma, depth invasion EUS was correct in 87% of cases. EUS disclosed metastatic perigastric lymph nodes in 15/27 patients, with a sensitivity of 56%. Positive predictability was 100%, specificity 100%, and negative predictability 82%. Diagnostic accuracy was 85%. Differential diagnosis with EUS among lymphoma, linitis plastic and Ménétrier's disease was difficult. Large particle biopsy must be considered when EUS diagnosis of these diseases remains uncertain.

Portal hypertension: review of data and influence on management.

It is evident that endoscopic ultrasonography could have a great clinical role in the selection of the best treatment for the individual patient because it allows the simultaneous visualization of a large part of the portal venous system and its collaterals. It has not been shown that the same kind of treatment is suitable for every patient with portal hypertension, and failure of a particular treatment may be attributable to an incorrect selection of patients. Further perspective studies with EUS in patients with portal hypertension are thus necessary in order to clearly state the cost-benefit of this technique in the management of these subjects.

Endoscopy versus endoscopic ultrasonography in staging reflux esophagitis.

Precise staging of reflux esophagitis is very important for therapeutic decisions; in fact, chronic gastroesophageal reflux may cause transmural inflammation that leads to fibrosis with loss of esophageal wall compliance. In reflux esophagitis, endoscopic stating is limited to mucosal injury, while endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is able to visualize changes in the layer structure and localized or diffuse thickenings of the esophageal wall. In order to evaluate the usefulness of EUS in reflux esophagitis, a prospective study of 31 patients and ten normal subjects was performed. Endoscopic reflux esophagitis was staged as: E1 (erythema, n = 7), E2 (erosions, n = 13), E3 (ulcers, n = 11). EUS findings were recorded and evaluated at five different levels, starting from the gastroesophageal junction, using a quantitative method, the center line method. With this method, the sectorial and mean thickness, and area were calculated for each level. There was a significant difference between patients with reflux esophagitis and normal subjects in our study. E3 patients showed a significant upward involvement of the wall far from the visible lesions. Mild esophagitis may also cause esophageal wall thickening, involving even the entire wall. There was no correlation between the onset time of symptoms and the degree of thickening. In conclusion, EUS seems to be an important supplement to endoscopy in staging reflux esophagitis, as the progression of the inflammation is not related to the endoscopic findings.